PORTFOLIO EVALUATION

Remeber that EACH evidence on your portfolio should include:
    a. Title
    b. Your artifact (video, recording, mindmap, comic, writing, etc)
    c. A paragraph with your personal reflection 

WHAT CAN YOU INCLUDE IN THE REFLECTION?

 What have you learned? / What did you practice? / What do you have to improve? 
Was it easy or difficult to do it? / What did you like or dislike about this activity? / 

This is the rubric to evaluate your portfolio.

Make sure you cover all the points.

	2 POINTS	1.5 POINT	1 POINT	0.5 POINT
COMPLETE	It includes a minimum of: a) 3 written and   3 oral evidences. Each one  with their reflections or comments about your learning and the feedback you received.           + b) Two revised and corrected essays           + c) A general final reflection of this class, topics, activities & your learning	It misses 1 or 2 elements. The posts miss a few reflections/ despcriptions about the activities.	It misses 2-4 evidences. The posts miss some reflections/ descriptions about the activities.	It misses all the reflections  or  it has only 1 evidence complete.
ORGANIZED	The blog is clearly organized. Anyone who sees the blog can understand what each entry is about because they include a title and a short description.	1 or two entries are not well labeled or identified but it can be still understood.	More than 3 entries are missing a title or a description or it isn’t clearly organized.	The blog is messy and not efficiently organized which represents a difficulty to the reader. None of the entries or evidences include neither a title nor a description.
ATTRACTIVE	The blog includes colors, fonts, letter size, pictures, hyperlinks, emebedded elements etc. which make it  attractive to the readers. There are NO grammar or spelling mistakes.	There are few spelling mistakes but the grammar  is correct and the presentation is attractive.	There aren’t grammar or spelling mistakes but its presentation looks flat. Or The presentation is attractive but there are few spelling or grammar mistakes.	There are 3 or more  important/basic grammar or spelling mistakes and  its presentation looks flat.
COMMENTED	They received and gave comments and feedback which is well justified from a minimum of four partners.	They received or gave comments and feedback which is well justified from a minimum of two partners.	Received and gave comments, but they were poor and not well justified.	They didn't receive any comments on their blog because they  didn’t comment any blog. NOTE: 0 Points
PRESENTED	The presentation included a reflection on what the best of the blog was, what it is in need of improvement and connects this final reflection with the comments s/he gave and received. Its length was appropriate (1-3 minutes).	The presentation included a reflection, but it misses some information (what the best of the blog was, what it is in need of improvement and connects this final reflection with the comments s/he gave and received) or its length wasn’t appropriate (too long/too short- less than a minute more than 3 minutes)	The presentation included a reflection, but it misses some information (what the best of the blog was, what it is in need of improvement and connects this final reflection with the comments s/he gave and received) and its length wasn’t appropriate (too long/too short- 2 to 3 minutes)	The presentation was very poor and wasn’t well justified. It was careless and didn't showcase their work.

It was a pleasure to have worked and learned from you.

    Yours sincerely,        

                       Ms. Toledo